Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Academic Articles Awards > Procedure

Presumptions in EU Competition Law

Cyril Ritter, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, December 2017

See Cyril Ritter's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 9, 2018. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 10, 2018.

Click here to read the full article online

A presumption is usually defined as using a known fact to infer another fact. However, presumptions could be defined more broadly, as including several types of logical leaps, shortcuts, automatisms, burden-shifting mechanisms and predispositions. Using more than 30 such ""presumptions"" as examples, this paper tries to:

(a) provide a description and a classification of presumptions in EU competition law;

(b) explore to what extent these presumptions are compatible with fundamental rights and general principles of EU law; and

(c) explain the rationales for presumptions in EU competition law.

Download our brochure