Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Academic Articles Awards > Economics

Private Labels: Challenges for Competition Law and Economics

Hila Nevo and Roger Van den Bergh, 40 World Competition, Issue 2, pp. 271–298

See Hila Nevo's resume See Roger Van den Bergh's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 9, 2018. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 10, 2018.

Click here to read the full article online

This article deals with the competition concerns that arise from the continuing growth of private labels. It provides an overview of the existing knowledge in economics and discusses how competition authorities may profit from this knowledge in assessing potential anticompetitive effects in retailing markets. Private labels increase retailers’ power by strengthening their gatekeeper’s role. On upstream markets, private labels may enable large retailers to obtain more favourable contract terms from manufacturers that may put at risk the financial viability of the latter. On downstream markets, the popularity of private labels may allow powerful retailers to increase their market shares. Even though empirical research is still inconclusive in establishing a link between the growth of private labels and abusive buyer power, recent trends observed in groceries markets justify an analysis of likely anticompetitive effects. Insights from transaction cost analysis may help in clarifying the impact of buyer power as bargaining strength and improve the competitive assessment of private labels. The article suggests an inverse Small but Significant and Non-Transitory Increase in Price (SSNIP) test to define relevant markets and proposes a framework to balance pro- and anticompetitive effects of private labels, which could be used by competition authorities.

Download our brochure