Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Academic Articles Awards > Procedure

Re-designing the American Antitrust Machine Part I: Treble Damages, Contribution and Claim Reduction

John DeQ. Briggs, Chapter in "Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg Liber Americorum", Concurrences, Forthcoming, January 2018

See John DeQ Briggs's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 9, 2018. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 10, 2018.

Click here to read the full article online

This is the first in a contemplated series of articles, and eventually a book, about “the American Antitrust Machine” and how it might or should be reconsidered if it were built from the ground up in order to serve agreed competition policies with enforcement machinery, both public and private, designed to implement such policies in a complementary and coherent way. Most of the economies in the world, both developed and developing, have established or redesigned their competition policies and associate enforcement machinery just since the onset of the 21st-century. The United States has felt no need to do so and the idea of doing so has never been seriously advanced.
This Part I, addresses several singular features of the private damages recovery machinery in United States: treble damages, joint and several liability, contribution, and claim reduction. These topics have been the source of multiple articles and proposals over the years, but almost always in the somewhat narrow context of dealing with them in largely unconnected silos. None of the writings on this subject that the author has been able to uncover arise in the context of rethinking the entire corpus of American antitrust law and policy. Accordingly, this article should not be viewed as a stand-alone proposal, but part of a far broader mosaic of change, the elements of which are alluded to herein, but which are not as yet fully developed. Therefore, the proposals advanced in this paper are subject to change once the weaving of the larger fabric is underway and other voices are heard.

Download our brochure