Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Business Articles Awards > Unilateral Conduct

District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss FTC Section 5 Complaint Against Qualcomm

Greg Sivinski, Competition Policy International, August 16, 2017

See Greg Sivinski's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 9, 2018. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 10, 2018.

Click here to read the full article online

Early this year, the US Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) filed a complaint in the Northern District of California charging Qualcomm with violating Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits “unfair methods of competition.” The FTC’s complaint alleges that Qualcomm used anticompetitive tactics to maintain a monopoly in the supply of baseband processors for use in cell phones and other consumer products. It further contends that Qualcomm has market and monopoly power in the markets for CDMA baseband processors and Premium LTE baseband processors.

Download our brochure