Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Business Articles Awards > Private Enforcement

Litigating Indirect Purchasers Claims: Lessons for the EU from the U.S. Experience

Michael Hausfeld et al., Antitrust, Fall 2017, Vol 32 No. 1

See Michael Hausfeld's resume See Irving Scher's resume See Laurence Sorkin's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 9, 2018. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 10, 2018.

Click here to read the full article online

There have been significant developments in the last 15 years regarding private enforcement of the European Union antitrust laws, culminating in a Directive issued in November 2014 intended to remove some of the barriers to private antitrust actions in the Member States. The Directive establishes that any person who has suffered harm caused by a competition law infringement, including indirect purchasers, may claim full compensation for that harm. It applies to both follow-on and stand-alone actions. The Directive creates a rebuttable presumption that cartel infringers cause harm; provides for a passing-on defense; establishes a presumption that an overcharge is passed on to indirect purchasers; and allows claims to be brought by indirect purchasers at all levels of the distribution chain.

Download our brochure