Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Business Articles Awards > Concerted Practices

Sister Company Liability for Antitrust Conspiracies: Open Questions in Reconciling Copperweld and Twombly

Jonathan Justl & Carol Liu, ABA Antitrust Section, Civil Practice & Procedure Committee, Young Lawyers Advisory Panel’s Perspectives in Antitrust Newsletter, November 2017

See Jonathan Justl's resume See Carol Liu's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 9, 2018. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 10, 2018.

Click here to read the full article online

This Article discusses general principles of corporate liability under Copperweld, which form a backdrop to “single enterprise” theories asserted by some plaintiffs. The Article then summarizes examples of two divergent lines of authority weighing in different directions on whether a sister company can be held liable for an affiliate’s conduct. It concludes by identifying a number of open questions that might arise in litigation over a sister company’s liability for an affiliate’s actions in a Sherman Act conspiracy.

Download our brochure