Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Business Articles Awards > Intellectual Property

The UK High Court of Justice issues an injunction prohibiting an undertaking from selling wireless telecommunications products in Britain due to its failure to enter into a worldwide patent license

Matthew G. Rose et al., e-Competitions Bulletin, August 2017

See Jay Jurata's resume See Emily Luken's resume See Matthew Rose's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 9, 2018. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 10, 2018.

Click here to read the full article online

This article examines the potential competitive harms that would result from a regime where mandatory worldwide SEP licensing is considered FRAND. In order to fully comprehend the ramifications of the decision, Section II first provides a background on SEPs, the FRAND commitment, and competition law. Section III then analyzes Mr Justice Birss’s ruling in Unwired Planet v. Huawei, with a specific focus on the worldwide license issue. Section IV discusses the potential harms implicated in requiring worldwide licensing. Finally, Section V concludes by presenting alternatives to address concerns over patent hold-up.

Download our brochure