Stephen Wisking is a partner at Herbert Smith Freehills, based in London. Stephen practises in all aspects of competition law. He has extensive experience in contentious competition matters including cartels, market investigations and competition litigation (follow-on damages, stand-alone litigation and regulatory appeals) as well as providing non-contentious strategic competition advice and advising on mergers. He has been involved in competition disputes since the start of his career and has been involved in numerous cases in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) since its inception in 2001. He is a qualified solicitor advocate and has appeared as an advocate in the CAT. His particular sectoral experience is in relation to media (particularly broadcasting), telecoms, energy and pharmaceuticals and professional services. Stephen works on large and complex competition and economic regulatory disputes and investigations involving highly technical expert evidence.
Supreme Court ruling in Merricks: Some important clarifications but a number of unresolved issuesHerbert Smith Freehills Competition Notes blog, Kim Dietzel, Stephen Wisking, Daniel Woods and Ruth Allen, December 15, 2020
Taking Stock of the Collective Proceedings Regime in the Competition Appeal Tribunal – A Successful Compromise?Ruth Allen and Stephen Wisking, Due to be published Spring 2020: This article is based on a presentation by Stephen Wisking at ''The Civil Procedure Rules At 20' conference on 10 June 2019 at the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights.