Why Isn’t “Deterrence” Included in the Measurements of Antitrust “Enforcement”?

Click here to read the full article online

Most assessments of the vigor of antitrust enforcement rely on statistics as to the numbers of cases that are initiated: More cases imply more vigor. But if deterrence is a factor in the enforcement process, then there ought to be an inverted parabola – a “Laffer curve” – that represents the relationship between cases brought and enforcement efforts. And on the right-hand-side of this curve, more vigorous enforcement effort is associated with fewer cases that are brought: because there are fewer violations to be detected and prosecuted. The effects of deterrence need to be integrated into assessments of enforcement.