Winner Nascent competitors Scott Hemphill New York University United States 11 contributions 11198 visits , Tim Wu Columbia University (New York) United States 1 contribution 470 visits
The economic basis of the independent contractor/employee distinction Eric Posner US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States 2 contributions 5068 visits
Antitrust as antiracism: Antitrust as a partial cure for systemic racism (and other systemic “isms”) Mark Suter Berger Montague , Reginald L. Streater Berger Montague , Joshua Paul Davis University of San Francisco United States 1 contribution 839 visits …
The political face of antitrust Jacob Morse Loyola University Chicago School of Law United States , Spencer Weber Waller Loyola University Chicago School of Law United States 4 contributions 3261 visits
The looming crisis in antitrust economics Herbert J. Hovenkamp University of Pennsylvania United States 10 contributions 6410 visits
Prisms of distance and power: Viewing the U.S. regulatory tradition David J. Gerber Chicago-Kent College of Law United States 7 contributions 5687 visits
Competition law as a form of social regulation Ioannis Lianos Hellenic Competition Commission (Athens) Greece 34 contributions 98399 visits
Antitrust’s implementation blind side: Challenges to major expansion of U.S. competition policy Alison Jones King’s College (London) United Kingdom 20 contributions 81133 visits , William E. Kovacic King’s College (London) United States 74 contributions 86778 visits
Corona and EU Economic Law: Competition and Free Movement in Times of Crisis Friso Bostoen European University Institute (Florence) Belgium 2 contributions 3302 visits , Nina Colpaert KU Leuven Belgium , Wouter Devroe Belgian Competition Authority (Brussels) Belgium …
Some reactions to “reactionary antitrust” Seth Sacher US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States 2 contributions 469 visits , John M. Yun George Mason University (Fairfax) United States 1 contribution 469 visits
Winner Priority-setting as a double-edged sword: How modernisation strengthened the role of public policy Or Brook University of Leeds United Kingdom
Proportionality of fines in the context of global cartel enforcement Pieter Huizing Allen & Overy Netherlands
Vertical restraints after Generics and Budapest Bank Pablo Ibáñez Colomo London School of Economics United Kingdom 57 contributions 300412 visits
Direct evidence of a Sherman Act agreement William H. Page University of Florida United States 2 contributions 1453 visits
Corona Crisis Cartels: Sense and Sensibility Abel D’Ailly Dutch Ministry of Finance (The Hague) Netherlands , Maarten Pieter Schinkel University of Amsterdam Netherlands 2 contributions 89 visits
Compensatory public good provision by a private cartel Maarten Pieter Schinkel University of Amsterdam Netherlands 2 contributions 89 visits , Lukáš Tóth Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Netherlands
EU Competition Law and the Rule of Reason revisited Giorgio Monti European University Institute (Florence) Italy 1 contribution 62 visits
Corporate disclosure as a tacit coordination mechanism: Evidence from cartel enforcement regulations Guoman She University of Hong Kong China , Thomas Bourveau Columbia University (New York) United States , Alminas Zaldokas Hong Kong University of Science and Technology China
’I’ll call my Union’, said the driver - Collective bargaining of gig workers under EU competition (...) Maria José Schmidt-Kessen Copenhagen Business School Denmark , Catherine Jacqueson University of Copenhagen Denmark , Yvette Lind Copenhagen Business School Denmark …
Winner Dominance and market definition in the pharmaceutical industry following the ECJ Paroxetine judgment Damien Neven The Graduate Institute for International and Development Studies (Geneva) Switzerland 14 contributions 32557 visits , Georges Siotis University Carlos III Spain 3 contributions 11796 visits
Readers’ Choice Monopolization standards in US Competition Law: Evolution and evaluation Ivana Rakić Serbian Commission for Protection of Competition (Belgrade) Serbia
An antitrust framework for false advertising Michael A. Carrier Rutgers University (New Brunswick) United States 26 contributions 23204 visits , Rebecca L. Tushnet Harvard Law School (Cambridge) United States
Sanctioning unfair pricing under Art. 102(a) TFEU: Yes, we can! Marco Botta European University Institute (Florence) Germany 1 contribution 462 visits
Does a federal price-gouging law even make sense? And, if so, what should it look like? Tiffany D. Lipscomb-Jackson Jones Day United States 3 contributions 1195 visits , Michelle Fischer Jones Day United States 12 contributions 4447 visits
Excessive pricing during the COVID-19 crisis in the EU - An empirical inquiry Behrang Kianzad University of Copenhagen Denmark 2 contributions 3365 visits
Falling through the cracks no more? Article 102 TFEU and sustainability I – the nexus between dominance, environmental (...) Marios Iacovides Uppsala University , Chris Vrettos Stockholm University Sweden
No alarm and many surprises: Salience as a basis for excessive pricing intervention in an antitrust (...) Omar Vásquez Duque Stanford University United States 1 contribution 2719 visits
The Sherman Act is a no-fault monopolization statute: A textualist demonstration Robert H. Lande University of Baltimore United States 1 contribution 1593 visits , Richard O. Zerbe University of Washington United States
Radical for whom? Unsustainable business practices as abuses of dominance Chris Vrettos Stockholm University Sweden , Marios Iacovides Uppsala University
Winner Normative goals in merger control: Why merger control should not attempt to achieve “better” outcomes than (...) Stefan Thomas Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen Germany 14 contributions 41936 visits
Analyzing vertical mergers: Accounting for the unilateral effects tradeoff and thinking holistically about (...) Daniel Sokol USC Gould School of Law (Los Angeles) United States 10 contributions 3605 visits , Roger D. Blair University of Florida United States 4 contributions 383 visits , Christine Wilson US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States 7 contributions 6883 visits …
State-controlled entities in the EU merger control: The Case of PKN Orlen and Lotos Group Alexandr Svetlicinii University of Macau - Faculty of Law (Macau) China 283 contributions 223401 visits
Common ownership under the EUMR – Sailing a bit too close to the wind Jacques Buhart McDermott Will & Emery France 120 contributions 61831 visits , David Henry Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Belgium 63 contributions 97262 visits
De facto control in EU merger control law Alexandre Rouhette Kirkland & Ellis France 2 contributions 2939 visits , Pierre Garenne Linklaters France 1 contribution 1775 visits
You say you want an antitrust revolution? The paradox of modern merger control John Kwoka Northeastern University (London) United States 3 contributions 12578 visits
Competitive harm from vertical mergers Herbert J. Hovenkamp University of Pennsylvania United States 10 contributions 6410 visits
Winner FRAND licensing levels under EU Law Jean-Sébastien Borghetti University Paris-Panthéon-Assas France , Igor Nikolic European University Institute (Florence) Italy 1 contribution 290 visits , Nicolas Petit European University Institute (Florence) Italy 49 contributions 104009 visits
Standard-essential patents and FRAND licensing – At the crossroads of economic theory and legal (...) Tim W. Dornis Leuphana University of Lüneburg Germany 1 contribution 13 visits
Understanding the ANSI patent policy and why it matters William Cravens Morgan Lewis United States , Richard S. Taffet Morgan Lewis United States 11 contributions 22818 visits
Balancing incentives to innovate in upstream wireless technology markets with exit concerns in midstream component (...) Koren Wong-Ervin Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider United States 9 contributions 6817 visits , Jorge Padilla Compass Lexecon Belgium 40 contributions 79254 visits
The patent market power fallacy Lisa Kimmel American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) United States 1 contribution 783 visits
Four innovation myths Michael A. Carrier Rutgers University (New Brunswick) United States 26 contributions 23204 visits
Comments on patent remedies and complex products — A U.S. litigation perspective Richard J. Stark Cravath Swaine & Moore United States
A ’primarily property’ presumption is – still – really needed for the IP/antitrust interface Lawrence J. White New York University United States 6 contributions 6262 visits
International jurisdiction over standard-essential patents Henrik Horn Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN) Sweden
Antitrust policy toward patent licensing: Why negotiation matters Daniel F. Spulber Northwestern University United States 1 contribution 1217 visits
Winner Rebating antitrust fines to encourage private damages negotiations Severin Lenhard University of Bern (Bern) Switzerland , Winand Emons University of Bern (Bern) Switzerland
Asymmetric stakes in antitrust litigation Erik Hovenkamp USC Gould School of Law (Los Angeles) United States , Steven C. Salop Georgetown University (Washington) United States 2 contributions 1620 visits
Private enforcement in the UK: Effective redress for consumers? Barry J. Rodger University of Strathclyde (Glasgow) United Kingdom 4 contributions 3134 visits
Balancing disclosure and the protection of confidential information in private enforcement proceedings: The Commission’s (...) Konstantina Strouvali European Commission Belgium , Efstathia Pantopoulou European Commission Belgium
Cultural challenges to private antitrust enforcement in Latin America Julián Peña Allende & Brea Argentina 1 contribution 82 visits
Claiming cartel damages against the economic unit: One for all and all for one? Hans-Markus Wagener Higher Regional Court (Dusseldorf) Germany
Tackling pass-on in cartel cases: A comparative analysis of the interplay between damages law and economic (...) Franziska Weber Erasmus University Rotterdam Netherlands
The indirect purchaser rule and private enforcement of antitrust law: A reassessment Spencer Smith University of Chicago United States
Economic continuity of liability in antitrust damages – CJEU preliminary ruling in C-724/17 Skanska et (...) Ilkka Leppihalme Dittmar & Indrenius (Helsinki) Finland
Winner The boundaries of the firm and the reach of competition law: Corporate group liability and sanctioning in the EU and the (...) Carsten Koenig University of Cologne Germany
The omega man or the isolation of U.S. Antitrust Law Spencer Weber Waller Loyola University Chicago School of Law United States 4 contributions 3261 visits
The role of competition reforms in unlocking international trade: Evidence from Africa’s Proposed tripartite free trade (...) Cornelius Dube Zimbabwe Economic Policy Analysis and Research Unit (ZEPARU)
Extraterritoriality: Approaches around the world and model analysis Andrew Heimert US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States , Koren Wong-Ervin Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider United States 9 contributions 6817 visits
The long arm of state aid law: Crushing corporate tax avoidance Sandra Marco Colino The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 12 contributions 18617 visits
The three body problem – Extraterritoriality, comity and cooperation in competition law Pedro Caro de Sousa European Commission Belgium 3 contributions 3895 visits
Competition policy and the global economy: Current developments and issues for reflection Nadezhda Sporysheva World Trade Organization (Geneva) Switzerland , Anna-Caroline Muller World Trade Organization (Geneva) Switzerland , Robert D. Anderson University of Nottingham United Kingdom 1 contribution 315 visits …
Don’t open till doomsday: FDI screening in the EU—A cure for a covid-19-struck economy? Christian Peeters O’Melveny & Myers Belgium
EU Merger Control in a globalised economy Josep M. Carpi Badia European Commission Belgium 7 contributions 15760 visits
Innovation in the United States and Europe Jan Rybnicek George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School (Arlington) United States
Winner Equitable monetary relief under the FTC Act: An opportunity for a marginal improvement Bruce H. Kobayashi George Mason University (Fairfax) United States 1 contribution 1001 visits , James C. Cooper George Mason University (Fairfax) United States 1 contribution 69 visits
Towards a higher standard of proof and a more interventionist judicial review in antitrust cases involving complex (...) Camille Puech-Baron Herbert Smith Freehills Belgium 5 contributions 3537 visits , Kyriakos Fountoukakos Herbert Smith Freehills Belgium 107 contributions 67478 visits
The emerging contribution of director disqualification in UK Competition Law Peter Whelan University of Leeds United Kingdom 5 contributions 3790 visits
Fundamental procedural rights and effective enforcement of articles 101 and 102 TFEU in the European Competition (...) Wouter Wils King’s College (London) Belgium 43 contributions 63116 visits
"Settlements" and vertical restraints: "Good deal" or good law"? Jacques Derenne University of Liège Belgium 390 contributions 668715 visits , Catalina Chilaru Norton Rose Fulbright Belgium 4 contributions 1173 visits
High stakes at the high court: The FTC’s disgorgement authority comes before the Supreme Court Shari Ross Lahlou Dechert United States 2 contributions 190 visits , Gregory P. Luib Dechert United States 1 contribution 202 visits , Michael L. Weiner Steptoe & Johnson United States 8 contributions 26787 visits
Enhancing leniency programme in public markets Penelope Alexia Giosa University of Portsmouth United Kingdom 1 contribution 278 visits
Untangling the inextricable: The notion of ’same offence’ in EU Competition Law Valentina Sansonetti Single Resolution Board (Brussels) Belgium 1 contribution 955 visits , Pierpaolo Rossi European Commission Belgium 4 contributions 2026 visits
Disclosure in European Competition Litigation through the lens of US discovery Andreas Ruster Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan Germany , Sebastian von Massow WAGNER Arbitration (Berlin)
Positive EC guidance needed under Regulation 2 Romina Polley Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton Germany 5 contributions 2029 visits
Winner State interest and the state-centered approach to competition law in China Wendy Ng University of Melbourne Australia 68 contributions 15259 visits
Political, economic and legal driving forces shaping the developmental contours of competition law: the experience of (...) Andy Chen Taiwan Fair Trade Commission (Taipei) Taiwan 6 contributions 1311 visits
The Japanese cartel fining system: The 2019 amendments and its real issue Masako Wakui University of Kobe Japan 3 contributions 8686 visits , Jonathan Galloway Newcastle University United Kingdom 1 contribution 31 visits
China: Conglomerate mergers are facing heightened scrutiny Cheng Liu King & Wood Mallesons China 18 contributions 4432 visits , Audrey Yumeng Li King & Wood Mallesons China 8 contributions 3348 visits , Nick Torres Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC 4 contributions 888 visits
Work in progress: Hong Kong’s competition law five years on Kathleen Gooi Linklaters Hong Kong 1 contribution 77 visits , Marcus Pollard Linklaters Hong Kong 10 contributions 8340 visits
Mergers, antitrust, and the china card Eleanor M. Fox New York University United States 26 contributions 44748 visits
Should ASEAN antitrust laws emulate European competition policy? Dirk Auer University of Liège United States 5 contributions 1537 visits , Geoffrey Manne International Center for Law & Economics (Portland) United States 16 contributions 7430 visits , Samuel Bowman Stripe United States 2 contributions 105 visits
Is the “Opt-Out” Proceeding an Effective Approach to Enhance Antitrust Collective Action in China? With comparative (...) Xue Gan Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Germany
‘Hub-and-spoke’ bid-rigging and corporate attribution under Hong Kong Competition Law Kelvin H. F. Kwok Des Voeux Chambers (Hong Kong) China
Chilling competition? Trade associations & the Indian competition regime Dhanendra Kumar Competition Advisory Services India (COMPAD) India 1 contribution 1687 visits , Rahul Singh Khaitan India 3 contributions 1560 visits
Winner Digital Platforms and Antitrust Geoffrey Parker Dartmouth College (Hanover) United States , Georgios Petropoulos Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Sloan School of Management United States 4 contributions 5485 visits , Marshall Van Alstyne Boston University United States 2 contributions 1312 visits
Self-preferencing: Yet another epithet in need of limiting principles Pablo Ibáñez Colomo London School of Economics United Kingdom 57 contributions 300412 visits
Self-preferencing in markets with vertically-integrated gatekeeper platforms Joe Perkins Compass Lexecon United Kingdom 1 contribution 2220 visits , Salvatore Piccolo University of Bergamo Italy 2 contributions 4193 visits , Jorge Padilla Compass Lexecon Belgium 40 contributions 79254 visits
Antitrust and restrictions on privacy in the digital economy Nicholas Economides New York University United States 2 contributions 3591 visits , Ioannis Lianos Hellenic Competition Commission (Athens) Greece 34 contributions 98399 visits
When do markets tip? An overview and some insights for policy Özlem Bedre-Defolie European School of Management and Technology (ESMT) Germany , Rainer Nitsche E.CA Economics Germany 1 contribution 1303 visits
A legal framework for access to data – A competition policy perspective Robert Welker Humboldt University (Berlin) Germany , Heike Schweitzer Humboldt University (Berlin) Germany 5 contributions 5315 visits
Blockchain code as antitrust Vitalik Buterin Ethereum , Thibault Schrepel Vrije University of Amsterdam United States 6 contributions 16424 visits
Merger policy in digital markets an ex-post assessment Alessia Marrazzo Lear (Rome) Italy , Salvatore Nava Lear (Rome) Italy , Elena Argentesi Lear (Rome) Italy …
Radical Restorative Remedies for Digital Markets Nicolas Petit European University Institute (Florence) Italy 49 contributions 104009 visits , Michal S. Gal University of Haifa Israel 4 contributions 8218 visits
Big Tech mergers: Innovation, competition for the market, and the acquisition of emerging competitors Michael L. Katz University of California (Berkeley) United States 1 contribution 2345 visits
Winner Mergers, entry, and consumer welfare Peter Caradonna Georgetown University (Washington) United States , Nathan Miller Georgetown University (Washington) United States 2 contributions 4263 visits , Gloria Y. Sheu US Department of Justice United States
The impact of EU cartel policy reforms on the timing of settlements in private follow-on damages disputes—an empirical (...) Linda Gratz E.CA Economics Germany 1 contribution 2927 visits , Michael Rauber E.CA Economics Germany 7 contributions 11724 visits , Hans W. Friederiszick E.CA Economics Germany 6 contributions 8009 visits
A commissioners’ history of cartel enforcement in Europe: Multidimensional comparison of administrations Jonathan Freimark Analysis Group United States , Antoine Chapsal Analysis Group France 33 contributions 105888 visits , Pierre Y. Cremieux Analysis Group United States 5 contributions 4886 visits …
Pre-empting the entry of near perfect substitutes Vilen Lipatov CompetitionSphere Belgium 2 contributions 1774 visits , Damien Neven The Graduate Institute for International and Development Studies (Geneva) Switzerland 14 contributions 32557 visits , Georges Siotis University Carlos III Spain 3 contributions 11796 visits
Measuring the antitrust revolution Maia Crook University of Florida United States , Daniel Sokol USC Gould School of Law (Los Angeles) United States 10 contributions 3605 visits , Sara L. Bensley University of Florida United States
Vertical relations, pass-through, and market definition: Evidence from grocery retailing Christian Wey DICE Germany 1 contribution 4569 visits , Dennis Rickert MINES ParisTech France , Gordon Klein University of Münster Germany …
Competition laws and corporate innovation Chen Lin HKUST Business School , Lai Wei Lingnan University Hong Kong , Ross Levine University of California (Berkeley) United States …
Oligopoly coordination, economic analysis, and the prophylactic role of horizontal merger enforcement Jonathan B. Baker American University’s Washington College of Law (Washington) United States 4 contributions 10086 visits , Joseph Farrell University of California (Berkeley) United States 5 contributions 4494 visits
Antitrust economics and consumer protection economics in policy and litigation: Why the disparity? Lawrence J. White New York University United States 6 contributions 6262 visits
Tailoring critical loss to the competitive process Malcolm Coate US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States , Shawn W. Ulrick US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States , John M. Yun George Mason University (Fairfax) United States 1 contribution 469 visits
Reduced demand uncertainty and the sustainability of collusion: How AI could affect competition Jason O’Connor University of Pittsburgh United States , Nathan Wilson Compass Lexecon United States 1 contribution 695 visits
Is protecting sunk investments an economic rationale for antitrust law? Darryl Biggar Australian Energy Regulator Australia , Alberto Heimler Scuola Nazionale dell’Amministrazione 3 contributions 14339 visits
Most favoured nation clauses in need of an effects-based approach Avantika Chowdhury Oxera United Kingdom 11 contributions 10169 visits
