Winner Nascent competitors Scott Hemphill New York University France 11 contributions 11522 visits , Tim Wu Columbia University (New York) United States 1 contribution 584 visits
Some reactions to “reactionary antitrust” Seth Sacher US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States 2 contributions 535 visits , John M. Yun George Mason University (Fairfax) United States 1 contribution 535 visits
The economic basis of the independent contractor/employee distinction Eric A. Posner University of Chicago United States 3 contributions 6937 visits
Corona and EU Economic Law: Competition and Free Movement in Times of Crisis Friso Bostoen University of Tilburg Netherlands 2 contributions 3401 visits , Nina Colpaert KU Leuven Belgium , Wouter Devroe KU Leuven Belgium …
Antitrust’s implementation blind side: Challenges to major expansion of U.S. competition policy Alison Jones King’s College (London) United Kingdom 20 contributions 81379 visits , William E. Kovacic George Washington University - School of Law (Washington) United States 74 contributions 90119 visits
Antitrust as antiracism: Antitrust as a partial cure for systemic racism (and other systemic “isms”) Mark Suter , Reginald L. Streater Berger Montague United States , Joshua Paul Davis University of San Francisco United States 1 contribution 1048 visits …
The political face of antitrust Jacob Morse Loyola University Chicago School of Law United States , Spencer Weber Waller Loyola University Chicago School of Law United States 4 contributions 3488 visits
Competition law as a form of social regulation Ioannis Lianos University College London United Kingdom 36 contributions 102794 visits
The looming crisis in antitrust economics Herbert Hovenkamp University of Pennsylvania United States 10 contributions 6556 visits
Prisms of distance and power: Viewing the U.S. regulatory tradition David Gerber Chicago-Kent College of Law France 7 contributions 6005 visits
Winner Priority-setting as a double-edged sword: How modernisation strengthened the role of public policy Or Brook University of Leeds United Kingdom
Vertical restraints after Generics and Budapest Bank Pablo Ibáñez Colomo London School of Economics United Kingdom 57 contributions 301531 visits
Corona Crisis Cartels: Sense and Sensibility Abel D’Ailly Dutch Ministry of Finance (The Hague) Netherlands , Maarten Pieter Schinkel Mediahuis NRC (Amsterdam) Netherlands 2 contributions 106 visits
Direct evidence of a Sherman Act agreement William H. Page University of Florida United States 2 contributions 1496 visits
’I’ll call my Union’, said the driver - Collective bargaining of gig workers under EU competition rules Maria José Schmidt-Kessen Copenhagen Business School Denmark , Catherine Jacqueson University of Copenhagen Denmark , Yvette Lind Copenhagen Business School Denmark …
EU Competition Law and the Rule of Reason revisited Giorgio Monti European University Institute (Florence) Italy 1 contribution 67 visits
Corporate disclosure as a tacit coordination mechanism: Evidence from cartel enforcement regulations Guoman She University of Hong Kong China , Thomas Bourveau Columbia University (New York) United States , Alminas Zaldokas Hong Kong University of Science and Technology China
Compensatory public good provision by a private cartel Maarten Pieter Schinkel Mediahuis NRC (Amsterdam) Netherlands 2 contributions 106 visits , Lukáš Tóth Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Netherlands
Proportionality of fines in the context of global cartel enforcement Pieter Huizing Allen & Overy Netherlands
Winner Dominance and market definition in the pharmaceutical industry following the ECJ Paroxetine judgment Damien Neven The Graduate Institute for International and Development Studies (Geneva) Switzerland 15 contributions 33217 visits , Georges Siotis University Carlos III Spain 3 contributions 12069 visits
Readers’ Choice Monopolization standards in US Competition Law: Evolution and evaluation Ivana Rakić Serbian Commission for Protection of Competition (Belgrade) Serbia
No alarm and many surprises: Salience as a basis for excessive pricing intervention in an antitrust context Omar Vásquez Duque Stanford University United States 1 contribution 2816 visits
Does a federal price-gouging law even make sense? And, if so, what should it look like? Tiffany D. Lipscomb-Jackson Jones Day United States 3 contributions 1301 visits , Michelle Fischer Jones Day United States 12 contributions 4527 visits
Sanctioning unfair pricing under Art. 102(a) TFEU: Yes, we can! Marco Botta European University Institute (Florence) Germany 2 contributions 1570 visits
Falling through the cracks no more? Article 102 TFEU and sustainability I – the nexus between dominance, environmental (...) Marios Iacovides Uppsala University , Chris Vrettos Stockholm University Sweden
The Sherman Act is a no-fault monopolization statute: A textualist demonstration Robert H. Lande University of Baltimore United States 2 contributions 1602 visits , Richard O. Zerbe University of Washington United States
An antitrust framework for false advertising Michael A. Carrier Rutgers University (New Brunswick) United States 26 contributions 24772 visits , Rebecca L. Tushnet Harvard University United States
Radical for whom? Unsustainable business practices as abuses of dominance Chris Vrettos Stockholm University Sweden , Marios Iacovides Uppsala University
Excessive pricing during the COVID-19 crisis in the EU - An empirical inquiry Behrang Kianzad University of Copenhagen Denmark 3 contributions 7089 visits
Winner Normative goals in merger control: Why merger control should not attempt to achieve “better” outcomes than competition Stefan Thomas Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen Germany 14 contributions 42051 visits
Competitive harm from vertical mergers Herbert Hovenkamp University of Pennsylvania United States 10 contributions 6556 visits
De facto control in EU merger control law Alexandre Rouhette Kirkland & Ellis France 2 contributions 3203 visits , Pierre Garenne Linklaters France 1 contribution 1997 visits
Common ownership under the EUMR – Sailing a bit too close to the wind Jacques Buhart McDermott Will & Emery France 134 contributions 65628 visits , David Henry Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Belgium 64 contributions 98548 visits
Analyzing vertical mergers: Accounting for the unilateral effects tradeoff and thinking holistically about efficiencies Daniel Sokol University of Southern California United States 10 contributions 3779 visits , Roger D. Blair University of Florida United States 4 contributions 398 visits , Christine Wilson US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States 7 contributions 7135 visits …
You say you want an antitrust revolution? The paradox of modern merger control John Kwoka Northeastern University - Department of Economics (Boston) United States 3 contributions 14038 visits
State-controlled entities in the EU merger control: The Case of PKN Orlen and Lotos Group Alexandr Svetlicinii University of Macau - Faculty of Law China 284 contributions 224891 visits
Winner FRAND licensing levels under EU Law Jean-Sébastien Borghetti University Paris-Panthéon-Assas France , Igor Nikolic European University Institute (Florence) Italy 2 contributions 510 visits , Nicolas Petit European University Institute (Florence) Italy 49 contributions 104807 visits
Four innovation myths Michael A. Carrier Rutgers University (New Brunswick) United States 26 contributions 24772 visits
Understanding the ANSI patent policy and why it matters William Cravens Morgan Lewis United States , Richard S. Taffet Morgan Lewis United States 11 contributions 24363 visits
Balancing incentives to innovate in upstream wireless technology markets with exit concerns in midstream component (...) Koren W. Wong-Ervin University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) - (Beijing) United States 9 contributions 7365 visits , Jorge Padilla Compass Lexecon Belgium 40 contributions 81929 visits
Standard-essential patents and FRAND licensing – At the crossroads of economic theory and legal practice Tim W. Dornis Leuphana University of Lüneburg Germany 1 contribution 19 visits
The patent market power fallacy Lisa Kimmel American Intellectual Property Law Association - AIPLA (Arlington) United States 1 contribution 853 visits
International jurisdiction over standard-essential patents Henrik Horn Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN) Sweden
Comments on patent remedies and complex products — A U.S. litigation perspective Richard J. Stark Cravath Swaine & Moore United States
Antitrust policy toward patent licensing: Why negotiation matters Daniel F. Spulber Northwestern University United States 1 contribution 1261 visits
A ’primarily property’ presumption is – still – really needed for the IP/antitrust interface Lawrence J. White New York University United States 6 contributions 6659 visits
Winner Rebating antitrust fines to encourage private damages negotiations Severin Lenhard University of Bern Switzerland , Winand Emons University of Bern Switzerland
Asymmetric stakes in antitrust litigation Erik Hovenkamp University of Southern California United States , Steven C. Salop Georgetown University (Washington) United States 2 contributions 1656 visits
Cultural challenges to private antitrust enforcement in Latin America Julian Pena Allende & Brea (Maipu) Argentina 1 contribution 91 visits
Private enforcement in the UK: Effective redress for consumers? Barry J. Rodger University of Strathclyde (Glasgow) United Kingdom 4 contributions 3166 visits
The indirect purchaser rule and private enforcement of antitrust law: A reassessment Spencer Smith University of Chicago United States
Claiming cartel damages against the economic unit: One for all and all for one? Hans-Markus Wagener Higher Regional Court (Dusseldorf) Germany
Balancing disclosure and the protection of confidential information in private enforcement proceedings: The (...) Konstantina Strouvali European Commission Belgium , Efstathia Pantopoulou European Commission Belgium
Tackling pass-on in cartel cases: A comparative analysis of the interplay between damages law and economic insights Franziska Weber Erasmus University Rotterdam Netherlands
Economic continuity of liability in antitrust damages – CJEU preliminary ruling in C-724/17 Skanska et al. Ilkka Leppihalme Dittmar & Indrenius (Helsinki) Finland
Winner The boundaries of the firm and the reach of competition law: Corporate group liability and sanctioning in the EU and the US Carsten Koenig University of Cologne Germany
Competition policy and the global economy: Current developments and issues for reflection Nadezhda Sporysheva World Trade Organization (Geneva) Switzerland , Anna-Caroline Muller World Trade Organization (Geneva) Switzerland , Robert D. Anderson University of Nottingham United Kingdom 1 contribution 329 visits …
EU Merger Control in a globalised economy Josep M. Carpi Badia European Commission Belgium 7 contributions 16171 visits
The omega man or the isolation of U.S. Antitrust Law Spencer Weber Waller Loyola University Chicago School of Law United States 4 contributions 3488 visits
Don’t open till doomsday: FDI screening in the EU—A cure for a covid-19-struck economy? Christian Peeters O’Melveny & Myers Belgium
Innovation in the United States and Europe Jan Rybnicek George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School (Arlington) United States
The long arm of state aid law: Crushing corporate tax avoidance Sandra Marco Colino The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 12 contributions 19326 visits
Extraterritoriality: Approaches around the world and model analysis Andrew Heimert US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States , Koren W. Wong-Ervin University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) - (Beijing) United States 9 contributions 7365 visits
The role of competition reforms in unlocking international trade: Evidence from Africa’s Proposed tripartite free trade area Cornelius Dube Zimbabwe Economic Policy Analysis and Research Unit (ZEPARU)
The three body problem – Extraterritoriality, comity and cooperation in competition law Pedro Caro de Sousa European Commission Belgium 3 contributions 4018 visits
Winner Equitable monetary relief under the FTC Act: An opportunity for a marginal improvement Bruce H. Kobayashi George Mason University (Fairfax) United States 1 contribution 1038 visits , James C. Cooper George Mason University (Fairfax) United States 1 contribution 72 visits
Enhancing leniency programme in public markets Penelope Alexia Giosa University of Portsmouth United Kingdom 1 contribution 287 visits
Disclosure in European Competition Litigation through the lens of US discovery Andreas Ruster Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan Germany , Sebastian von Massow WAGNER Arbitration (Berlin)
The emerging contribution of director disqualification in UK Competition Law Peter Whelan University of Leeds United Kingdom 5 contributions 3869 visits
High stakes at the high court: The FTC’s disgorgement authority comes before the Supreme Court Shari Ross Lahlou Dechert United States 2 contributions 221 visits , Gregory P. Luib Dechert United States 1 contribution 206 visits , Michael L. Weiner Steptoe & Johnson United States 8 contributions 28225 visits
Untangling the inextricable: The notion of ’same offence’ in EU Competition Law Valentina Sansonetti Single Resolution Board (Brussels) Belgium 1 contribution 976 visits , Pierpaolo Rossi European Commission Belgium 4 contributions 2058 visits
Positive EC guidance needed under Regulation 2 Romina Polley Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton Germany 5 contributions 2419 visits
Fundamental procedural rights and effective enforcement of articles 101 and 102 TFEU in the European Competition Network Wouter Wils European Commission - Legal Service Belgium 45 contributions 67207 visits
Towards a higher standard of proof and a more interventionist judicial review in antitrust cases involving complex (...) Camille Puech-Baron Herbert Smith Freehills Belgium 5 contributions 3621 visits , Kyriakos Fountoukakos Herbert Smith Freehills Belgium 116 contributions 71577 visits
"Settlements" and vertical restraints: "Good deal" or good law"? Jacques Derenne Sheppard Mullin France 396 contributions 672691 visits , Catalina Chilaru Norton Rose Fulbright Belgium 4 contributions 1224 visits
Winner State interest and the state-centered approach to competition law in China Wendy Ng University of Melbourne Australia 68 contributions 15771 visits
Should ASEAN antitrust laws emulate European competition policy? Dirk Auer International Center for Law & Economics (Portland) United States 6 contributions 2695 visits , Geoffrey Manne International Center for Law & Economics (Portland) United States 16 contributions 7584 visits , Samuel Bowman Stripe United States 2 contributions 117 visits
Mergers, antitrust, and the china card Eleanor M. Fox NYU School of Law United States 27 contributions 46961 visits
Is the “Opt-Out” Proceeding an Effective Approach to Enhance Antitrust Collective Action in China? With comparative (...) Xue Gan Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Germany
The Japanese cartel fining system: The 2019 amendments and its real issue Masako Wakui Kyoto University Japan 3 contributions 8800 visits , Jonathan Galloway Newcastle University United Kingdom 1 contribution 36 visits
Chilling competition? Trade associations & the Indian competition regime Dhanendra Kumar Competition Advisory Services India (COMPAD) India 1 contribution 1698 visits , Rahul Singh National Law School of India University 3 contributions 1606 visits
Political, economic and legal driving forces shaping the developmental contours of competition law: the experience of Taiwan Andy Chen Taiwan Fair Trade Commission (Taipei) Taiwan 6 contributions 1338 visits
China: Conglomerate mergers are facing heightened scrutiny Cheng Liu King & Wood Mallesons France 19 contributions 4637 visits , Audrey Yumeng Li King & Wood Mallesons China 9 contributions 3494 visits , Nick Torres Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC 4 contributions 923 visits
Work in progress: Hong Kong’s competition law five years on Kathleen Gooi Linklaters Hong Kong 1 contribution 81 visits , Marcus Pollard Linklaters Hong Kong 10 contributions 8413 visits
‘Hub-and-spoke’ bid-rigging and corporate attribution under Hong Kong Competition Law Kelvin H. F. Kwok University of Hong Kong China
Winner Digital Platforms and Antitrust Geoffrey Parker Dartmouth College (Hanover) United States , Georgios Petropoulos Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) United States 4 contributions 5570 visits , Marshall Van Alstyne Boston University United States 2 contributions 1357 visits
Big Tech mergers: Innovation, competition for the market, and the acquisition of emerging competitors Michael L. Katz University of California (Berkeley) United States 1 contribution 2353 visits
Antitrust and restrictions on privacy in the digital economy Nicholas Economides New York University United States 2 contributions 3670 visits , Ioannis Lianos University College London United Kingdom 36 contributions 102794 visits
Self-preferencing in markets with vertically-integrated gatekeeper platforms Joe Perkins Queens’ College (Cambridge) United Kingdom 1 contribution 2249 visits , Salvatore Piccolo University of Bergamo Italy 2 contributions 4492 visits , Jorge Padilla Compass Lexecon Belgium 40 contributions 81929 visits
Radical Restorative Remedies for Digital Markets Nicolas Petit European University Institute (Florence) Italy 49 contributions 104807 visits , Michal S. Gal University of Haifa France 5 contributions 9312 visits
Blockchain code as antitrust Vitalik Buterin Ethereum , Thibault Schrepel Stanford University United States 8 contributions 18221 visits
Self-preferencing: Yet another epithet in need of limiting principles Pablo Ibáñez Colomo London School of Economics United Kingdom 57 contributions 301531 visits
Merger policy in digital markets an ex-post assessment Alessia Marrazzo Lear (Rome) Italy , Salvatore Nava Lear (Rome) Italy , Elena Argentesi Lear (Rome) Italy …
When do markets tip? An overview and some insights for policy Özlem Bedre-Defolie European School of Management and Technology (ESMT) Germany , Rainer Nitsche E.CA Economics Germany 1 contribution 1323 visits
A legal framework for access to data – A competition policy perspective Robert Welker Humboldt University (Berlin) Germany , Heike Schweitzer Humboldt University (Berlin) Germany 5 contributions 6037 visits
Winner Mergers, entry, and consumer welfare Peter Caradonna Georgetown University (Washington) United States , Nathan Miller Georgetown University (Washington) United States 2 contributions 4383 visits , Gloria Y. Sheu US Department of Justice United States
A commissioners’ history of cartel enforcement in Europe: Multidimensional comparison of administrations Jonathan Freimark Analysis Group United States , Antoine Chapsal Analysis Group France 36 contributions 109872 visits , Pierre Y. Cremieux Analysis Group United States 5 contributions 5032 visits …
Tailoring critical loss to the competitive process Malcolm Coate US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States , Shawn W. Ulrick US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States , John M. Yun George Mason University (Fairfax) United States 1 contribution 535 visits
Pre-empting the entry of near perfect substitutes Vilen Lipatov CompetitionSphere Belgium 2 contributions 1927 visits , Damien Neven The Graduate Institute for International and Development Studies (Geneva) Switzerland 15 contributions 33217 visits , Georges Siotis University Carlos III Spain 3 contributions 12069 visits
Is protecting sunk investments an economic rationale for antitrust law? Darryl Biggar Australian Energy Regulator Australia , Alberto Heimler Scuola Nazionale dell’Amministrazione 3 contributions 14381 visits
Oligopoly coordination, economic analysis, and the prophylactic role of horizontal merger enforcement Jonathan B. Baker American University’s Washington College of Law (Washington) United States 4 contributions 10191 visits , Joseph Farrell University of California (Berkeley) United States 5 contributions 4614 visits
Reduced demand uncertainty and the sustainability of collusion: How AI could affect competition Jason O’Connor US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) United States , Nathan Wilson Compass Lexecon United States 1 contribution 980 visits
Competition laws and corporate innovation Chen Lin HKUST Business School , Lai Wei Lingnan University Hong Kong , Ross Levine University of California (Berkeley) United States …
Most favoured nation clauses in need of an effects-based approach Avantika Chowdhury Oxera United Kingdom 13 contributions 11934 visits
Measuring the antitrust revolution Maia Crook University of Florida United States , Daniel Sokol University of Southern California United States 10 contributions 3779 visits , Sara L. Bensley University of Florida United States
Vertical relations, pass-through, and market definition: Evidence from grocery retailing Christian Wey DICE Germany 1 contribution 4728 visits , Dennis Rickert MINES ParisTech (Paris) France , Gordon Klein University of Münster Germany …
The impact of EU cartel policy reforms on the timing of settlements in private follow-on damages disputes—an empirical (...) Linda Gratz E.CA Economics Germany 1 contribution 2949 visits , Michael Rauber E.CA Economics Germany 7 contributions 11750 visits , Hans W. Friederiszick E.CA Economics Germany 6 contributions 8179 visits
Antitrust economics and consumer protection economics in policy and litigation: Why the disparity? Lawrence J. White New York University United States 6 contributions 6659 visits
