The EU Court of Justice issues a long-awaited judgement clarifying the extent of an undertaking ’ s liability in follow-on actions (Sumal / Mercedes Benz Trucks España)

Concurrences Bulletin, Enzo Marasà, Irene Picciano and Francesco Tognato, 6 October 2021, e-Competitions

Click here to read the full article online

On October 6, 2021, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the “ECJ” or “Court”) issued a long-awaited decision in case C-882/19, Sumal SL (“Sumal”) v Mercedes Benz Trucks España SL (“MBTE”) [1]. The judgment shed light on whether, under EU competition law, the victim of an anticompetitive practice may pursue a “follow-on” action against the subsidiary of a parent company, even when only the parent was found liable for antitrust infringement by decision of the European Commission (“Commission”). This largely regards anticompetitive agreements under Section 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“TFEU”), but also applies to abuse of dominance under Section 102 TFEU.

Authors

Testimonials

Inge Graef
University of Tilburg

Netherlands 4 contributions 5674 visits

The Antitrust Writing Awards illustrate the variety of topics and ideas in the competition community. They offer an excellent insight into current academic thinking and policy developments.
Alexandre Cordeiro Macedo
Brazilian Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE) (Brasilia)

Brazil 4 contributions 2887 visits

The Antitrust Writing Awards must be congratulated for its initiative of promoting the exchange of knowledge and research in competition policy. It was an unparalleled opportunity to be a member of the Board and present the Best Soft Law category. I feel honored and I commend Concurrences for organizing such an important endeavor.
Christian Bovet
University of Geneva

Switzerland 7 contributions 21749 visits

Participating in the steering committee is an excellent opportunity to learn each time more about competition law, not only about its substance and trends, but also about the great diversity of this ever evolving matter. The Awards ensure the continuing renewal of authors and sources.
David Gerber
Chicago-Kent College of Law

France 7 contributions 6099 visits

Nicolas Charbit, his Concurrences team, and their Antitrust Writing Awards project provide immensely valuable service to antitrust lawyers and scholars everywhere. They give form, force and impetus to competition law thinking and to relationships within the competition law community.
Mel Marquis
Monash University

Italy 8 contributions 4367 visits

The Antitrust Writing Awards, established over a decade ago, are still going strong. The broad range of contributions and award winners this year reflect the staggering richness of legal and economic studies in this field.